Skip to content

PBM-1484 Updated GCS configuration example and options #261

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nastena1606
Copy link
Collaborator

modified: docs/details/storage-config-example.md
modified: docs/reference/configuration-options.md

@@ -50,20 +50,20 @@ storage:

The storage provider’s name.

Supported values: `aws`, `gcs`
Supported values: `aws`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the purpose of that configuration if only 1 value is allowed? Should we deprecate it?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boris-ilijic could you please comment?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, didn't see the message until now. Yes we removed that param from config. @veceraj can confirm

Copy link
Collaborator

@veceraj veceraj May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Provider is in the s3 configuration, but even before starting my work on the AWS migration, this field had no usages. I guess we could mark it deprecated.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

marked as deprecated in the description


### storage.s3.region

*Type*: string <br>
*Required*: YES (for AWS and GCS)
*Required*: YES (for AWS)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it's required for AWS, and AWS is the only option - it's just "YES"

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. MinIO also uses s3 type and region is not mandatory there

modified:   docs/details/storage-config-example.md
	modified:   docs/reference/configuration-options.md
modified:   docs/reference/configuration-options.md
moved related content from s3
Added HMAC options
Added migration guide from s3 to gcs
@@ -50,20 +50,20 @@ storage:

The storage provider’s name.

Supported values: `aws`, `gcs`
Supported values: `aws`
Copy link
Collaborator

@veceraj veceraj May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Provider is in the s3 configuration, but even before starting my work on the AWS migration, this field had no usages. I guess we could mark it deprecated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants